New Zealand host India in the second T20I at Hagley Oval, Christchurch, and the data points toward a match shaped by recent head-to-head strength and current form. CricStats’ numbers do not guarantee an outcome, but they do offer a clear baseline: India arrive with the stronger recent record, while New Zealand will rely on home conditions and a venue where chasing has produced a slight advantage.
Head-to-head: India hold the larger sample edge
The all-time T20I record between these sides is competitive, but India have built a clear lead over time. Across 29 meetings, India have won 17, New Zealand 11, with one match tied, drawn or ending with no result.
That translates to a win rate of 58.6% for India and 37.9% for New Zealand in the full rivalry sample. More importantly, the most recent trend has been even more one-sided in India’s favour.
| Metric | New Zealand | India |
|---|
| Matches played | 29 | 29 |
| Wins | 11 | 17 |
| Win percentage | 37.9% | 58.6% |
| Last 10 decisive meetings | 20% | 80% |
Recent meetings have tilted strongly to India
The last five completed meetings underline that shift. India won by 96 runs and 46 runs in their two most recent encounters in March and January 2026, while New Zealand’s lone win in that stretch came by 50 runs. India also won by 8 wickets and by 7 wickets in earlier matches in the sequence.
That pattern matters because it reflects not just results, but margin. When a side repeatedly wins by large margins, it usually indicates a stronger control of both batting phases and bowling containment.
Current form: India have the better recent return
Recent form across each side’s last 10 completed T20Is also favours India. New Zealand have won 4 of their last 10, while India have won 7 of their last 10, with one no result in that span.
New Zealand’s sequence shows inconsistency: two losses, two wins, two losses, then alternating results. India’s run is steadier, even with the no result and the two defeats against the West Indies in October 2026.
| Team | Last 10 T20Is | Wins | Losses | Win rate |
|---|
| New Zealand | L L W W L L W L W NR | 4 | 5 | 44% |
| India | NR L W L W W W W W W | 7 | 2 | 78% |
India’s 78% recent win rate is a major signal in this preview. New Zealand’s 44% is not poor in isolation, but it is clearly weaker than India’s output over the same type of recent window.
Venue profile: Hagley Oval slightly favours chasing
Hagley Oval has hosted 15 completed T20Is, and the split is fairly even, though chasing has had the marginal edge. Teams batting first have won 6 times, while teams chasing have won 8.
The average first-innings total at the venue is 161, which suggests a middling scoring environment rather than a consistently high-scoring ground. That average is useful because it frames the sort of total that may be competitive without assuming extreme conditions.
| Hagley Oval T20I record | Value |
|---|
| Completed matches | 15 |
| Wins batting first | 6 |
| Wins chasing | 8 |
| Average first-innings total | 161 |
What the venue numbers suggest
A first-innings score around or above the venue average should be competitive, but the chasing record indicates that batting second is not a disadvantage here. That gives captains and batting units a practical reference point, especially in a format where one over can change the expected result profile.
Key form players over the last 12 months
Since the squads are not confirmed, the most relevant approach is to focus on players who have been in strong recent T20I form. For New Zealand, Tim Seifert leads the batting group with 452 runs in 13 innings, followed by Finn Allen with 378 runs in 9 innings and Glenn Phillips with 357 runs in 11 innings.
For India, the batting output is even larger in volume. Ishan Kishan has 1145 runs in 31 innings, Abhishek Sharma has 1114 runs in 40 innings, and Tilak Varma has 792 runs in 33 innings.
| Batting form | Runs | Innings | Best | Average per innings |
|---|
| Tim Seifert | 452 | 13 | 89 | 34.8 |
| Finn Allen | 378 | 9 | 100 | 42.0 |
| Glenn Phillips | 357 | 11 | 78 | 32.5 |
| Ishan Kishan | 1145 | 31 | 103 | 36.9 |
| Abhishek Sharma | 1114 | 40 | 108 | 27.9 |
| Tilak Varma | 792 | 33 | 73 | 24.0 |
On the bowling side, India also show stronger wicket-taking depth in the recent 12-month sample. Arshdeep Singh has 40 wickets in 28 matches, Varun Chakravarthy 35 in 22, and Axar Patel 34 in 27. New Zealand’s leading wicket-takers in the same period include Jacob Duffy with 19 wickets in 15 matches and Mitchell Santner with 17 in 19.
| Bowling form | Wickets | Matches | Wickets per match |
|---|
| Jacob Duffy | 19 | 15 | 1.27 |
| Mitchell Santner | 17 | 19 | 0.89 |
| Matt Henry | 13 | 11 | 1.18 |
| Arshdeep Singh | 40 | 28 | 1.43 |
| Varun Chakravarthy | 35 | 22 | 1.59 |
| Axar Patel | 34 | 27 | 1.26 |
Fixture-specific history supports India’s edge
Since 2021, the leading run-scorer in this fixture is Suryakumar Yadav with 526 runs in 14 innings, while Ishan Kishan has 372 runs in 12 innings and Daryl Mitchell has 349 in 15 innings. On the wicket table, Arshdeep Singh leads with 17 wickets, followed by Ish Sodhi with 13 and Axar Patel with 11.
This matters because fixture-specific data often captures repeat matchups better than broad career numbers. When the same players repeatedly produce in the same opposition contest, the trend can be more informative than one isolated series.
| Since 2021 | Runs/Wickets | Innings/Matches |
|---|
| Suryakumar Yadav | 526 runs | 14 inns |
| Ishan Kishan | 372 runs | 12 inns |
| Daryl Mitchell | 349 runs | 15 inns |
| Arshdeep Singh | 17 wickets | matches |
| Ish Sodhi | 13 wickets | matches |
| Axar Patel | 11 wickets | matches |
Prediction: the numbers point to India
CricStats’ computed lean gives India a 73% chance and New Zealand 27%, which aligns with the broader sample across head-to-head, recent form and fixture trends. The forecast is not certainty, but the balance of evidence clearly favours India.
New Zealand’s path to narrowing that gap is straightforward in theory: improve on their 44% recent win rate and reduce the scoring pressure India’s top-order and spin options have usually applied in this matchup. Based on the data alone, however, India enter this 2nd T20I as the stronger side on every major measurable indicator.
| Predicted lean | Chance |
|---|
| New Zealand | 27% |
| India | 73% |